A Comparison of the Characterization of Sherlock Holmes Essay

A Comparison of the Characterization of Sherlock Holmes - Essay Example Sherlock Holmes is the most prominent creation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Since Holmes’s first fictional appearance in 1887, he has become the model of the amateur private detective. Although Sherlock Holmes is not one of the first private detectives who came into the fiction world, the fame he attained after his literary origin dwarfed his fictional ancestors and started his way to eternity. Together with his friend Dr. Watson, they have frequently appeared in all sorts of literature, movies and TV series. In the movie, the novel and the show, Sherlock Holmes is character is portrayed differently and similarly. Similarities: In the novel and in the movie, Sherlock Holmes is a detective; he is brilliant and intelligent, and very knowledgeable. Differences: In the novel, Sherlock Holmes is portrayed as a musician because he plays the violin so well, he his knowledgeable in many fields like literature, politics, botany, geology, chemistry, British law and anatomy. He is also an expert in boxing; he is a swordsman and a singlestick player. In the movie Sherlock Holmes (Robert Downey) he is portrayed differently as rude, dangerous, emotional and tricky. The main difference in the show Sherlock (Benedict Cumberbatch) is the mode of dressing because he puts on a big coat every time the time and is at all times professionally clad, and he sometimes stays away from the old styled hat, large oversized coat, and piped trouser that he has always had in past years. The other difference is that he possesses the art of assumption.

Final Examination Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Final Examination - Essay Example They wanted her to give in by putting pressure on her. They also threatened to tell other employees of what she had done. If this happened, then she knew that she would lose her job. For the second requirement, management showed outrageous conduct by terminating Kayte’s contract for following established laws. For the third requirement, management was the complainant. For the fourth requirement, her suffering was severe because she knew that she was going to lose her job for what she had done. The American Disabilities Act defines disabilities as â€Å"affecting a major life activity,† The areas of coverage are: vision, mental, motor skills, the ability to care for one’s self, and to commute to employment. Kayte has problems with her vision. For Kayte to prove disability discrimination, she must first prove that she has a disability. The definition of a disability is â€Å"a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activates of such an individual and a record of such impairment, or being regarded as having such impairment.† Kayte is physically impaired by her vision and it affects her major life activities. 3. If an inference of discrimination is met, the employer must show that the rejection was not a hidden pretext for discrimination (This allows clients to get evidence behind the scenes, but cannot be done before this point) This is the rule that applies to the McDonnell Douglas vs. Green case: â€Å"such a complaint must state and contain a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.† The standard of proof in Green’s case is an evidentiary requirement and not one of correct pleading techniques. The Sutton vs. United Airlines case helps define how a visual disability should be treated. Kayte was discriminated against previously because she was able to perform her job excellently, but the company was not willing to accommodate her and allow her the